There’s a subtle difference between assigning someone a task and giving someone ownership.
A task sounds like:
“Implement this API.”
Ownership sounds more like:
“We need to solve this problem. You own figuring out the right solution.”
The difference is who is responsible for thinking about the outcome.
With a task, the person can successfully complete exactly what was asked and still fail to solve the underlying problem.
With ownership, they have to understand the why , make decisions, identify problems, and figure out when they need help.
But ownership doesn’t mean leaving someone alone.
Especially when someone is new, they may need more context, smaller checkpoints, or help thinking through the problem.
A useful progression is:
Task → Responsibility → Ownership → Autonomy
And ownership should come with enough authority to actually make decisions. Holding someone responsible for an outcome while making every decision for them isn’t really ownership.
The goal isn’t to distribute tasks.
It’s to gradually distribute problems, decisions, and responsibility for outcomes.
Give people something to own, not just something to do.
