The GEO Vendor Scorecard Nobody Talks About
You've watched the GEO space explode. Vendors are everywhere now, each claiming they'll crack ChatGPT visibility, Perplexity answers, or Claude citations. Their demos look flawless. Their case studies show traffic spikes. But here's the hard truth: most GEO vendors optimize for metrics that don't predict revenue.
When you're evaluating a GEO partner, you're not really choosing a feature set. You're choosing a revenue multiplier. And the vendors selling the loudest rarely measure what matters most.
This article walks you through the framework we use internally at Modulus to separate signal from noise—and how to apply it to any vendor comparison.
The Metrics That Lie (And What to Ask Instead)
Why appearance rate is not the same as conversion
Most GEO vendors lead with appearance metrics: "We got you into 47 AI overviews last month." Impressive. Meaningless without context.
An appearance in Claude's citation or a ChatGPT snippet is not equivalent to a conversion. The quality of that appearance, the audience segment seeing it, and whether it drives qualified traffic upstream is everything.
Ask: Can you break down appearance rate by AI engine and by audience intent? (A financial advisory firm cares about Perplexity B2B traffic; a SaaS company may care most about ChatGPT Pro users.)
Ask: What's your lift in qualified traffic month-over-month, and how do you distinguish qualified from noise?
Ask: Do you track follow-through—click-through from the AI response to the actual conversion funnel?
If a vendor can't answer these without hedging, you're looking at a feature play, not a revenue play.
Engagement depth beats volume
One appearance in a high-intent Perplexity response for a commercial keyword is worth more than ten mentions in looser AI conversations. Yet most vendors report raw counts.
Real question: Are you building moats in high-intent queries, or chasing vanity metrics? A good vendor can show you the difference and will have traced those responses back to pipeline.
The Contract Structure That Reveals True Confidence
The way a vendor prices and contracts GEO work tells you whether they believe in measurable outcomes or not. Performance-aligned incentives are rare. That scarcity is telling.
Here's a simple test: Ask how they'd structure a deal where their fee partially depends on your conversion lift.
Most will decline or offer a token variable component (5–10%). The best GEO vendors will push back on the question itself—not because they lack confidence, but because GEO outcomes depend partly on your content, your conversion funnel, and your product. They'll want to set baselines and define what "good" looks like before taking performance risk.
That's actually what you want to hear. It means they understand causation vs. correlation.
Red flag: Flat-fee vendors with no outcome tracking. You're buying labor or software access, not results.
Green flag: Vendors who want a baseline audit, define success metrics together, and track month-over-month with you. They're aligned.
The Setup Conversation That Separates Tiers
Before any work begins, a strong GEO vendor should dig into your business:
What conversion events actually matter? (Demo request, signup, content download, sales call?)
Which AI engines and user segments drive the highest LTV?
What's your current organic funnel look like, and where does AI discovery fit in it?
How does your content currently perform in traditional search? (Because GEO leverages similar assets.)
If they skip this and jump straight to "optimization," they're not thinking about your revenue. They're running a playbook.
The best vendors spend a week or two understanding your business before scoping work. They'll often tell you that GEO isn't the right lever for you right now—or that it works only for certain product lines or segments. That honesty is gold.
The Measurement Framework: What to Require
Before signing, lock in a shared measurement system:
Baseline: Current share of voice in AI engines for your target keywords.
Traffic attribution: How you'll tag and track traffic from AI sources back to your analytics. (UTM discipline matters.)
Conversion mapping: Which AI appearances connect to downstream conversions; which don't.
Monthly reporting: Appearance data, traffic impact, and conversion attribution in one shared dashboard.
Any vendor resistant to this level of transparency doesn't deserve access to your brand.
How Modulus Approaches This
We don't report GEO wins by appearance count. We trace them backward from revenue. Every month, we audit which AI-sourced visitors completed your priority conversion event, what keywords and engines drove them, and where our optimizations moved the needle.
Before we start, we spend time understanding your funnel, your unit economics, and which audience segments matter most. We're honest about where GEO will and won't move the dial. And we build measurement into the work from day one—not as an afterthought.
If you're evaluating GEO vendors or thinking about whether this channel fits your roadmap, Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) starts with a conversation about your business, not our process. Let's talk about what conversion actually looks like for you.
Read next from Modulus1:
Originally published on the Modulus1 insights blog. Browse more analysis on AI, SEO, and automation.
