If you’re comparing mailerlite vs mailchimp, you’re probably past the “send a newsletter” phase and into the “grow a list without losing your mind” phase. Both tools can ship emails, but they feel very different when you’re building automations, segmenting users, and trying to keep costs predictable.
Pricing and value: the bill matters more than features
MailerLite is typically the “clean pricing, fewer surprises” option. It’s built around the idea that most teams want solid newsletters, basic automation, and landing pages without enterprise-style add-ons.
Mailchimp, on the other hand, has become a broader marketing suite. That’s not automatically bad—but it usually means you’ll pay for capabilities (or complexity) you may not use. Two practical differences I see repeatedly:
- Contact management and billing gotchas: some platforms charge for stored contacts even if you’re not emailing them. That can punish you for keeping historical data.
- Plan thresholds: Mailchimp tiers can jump fast once your list grows, while MailerLite tends to stay friendlier for small-to-mid lists.
Opinionated take: if you’re bootstrapped or running a side project, pricing predictability beats “nice-to-have” features 9 times out of 10.
Builder UX and templates: speed vs control
MailerLite’s UI is minimal and fast. The editor is straightforward, and you can build decent-looking campaigns quickly. It’s hard to get lost.
Mailchimp’s editor is powerful, but it can feel heavier—especially if you’re doing lots of small iterations. If your workflow is “draft → send → learn → repeat,” friction matters.
Where Mailchimp can win:
- Larger template ecosystem and more knobs to tweak.
- More baked-in “marketing suite” features (ads, some CRM-ish bits).
Where MailerLite wins:
- Less clutter, quicker onboarding.
- Easier to hand off to non-marketers (founders, devrel, support).
If you value speed and consistency, MailerLite is hard to beat. If you need more design control inside the tool, Mailchimp has the edge.
Automation and segmentation: the real differentiator
This is where most “newsletter tools” either become growth platforms—or stay basic.
MailerLite supports automations (welcome series, link triggers, simple branching). For many creator and SaaS onboarding flows, that’s enough.
Mailchimp supports automations too, but the experience often depends on the plan. Advanced segmentation and behavioral targeting can push you toward higher tiers.
If automation is your main requirement, it’s worth knowing the alternatives:
- ActiveCampaign is the benchmark for deep automation and CRM-style pipelines.
- ConvertKit is popular with creators who want tagging and sequences without a corporate CRM vibe.
- Brevo (formerly Sendinblue) can be compelling if you want multi-channel messaging (email + SMS) on a tighter budget.
My rule: if your automations look like a flowchart with 30 branches, you’ll outgrow both MailerLite and Mailchimp faster than you think—then ActiveCampaign starts making sense.
Deliverability and data: measure what you can control
Deliverability is partly tool choice, partly your sending behavior. Both platforms are “good enough” for most legitimate senders, but you still need basics:
- Authenticate your domain (SPF, DKIM, DMARC).
- Keep lists clean (remove hard bounces, suppress inactive users).
- Don’t blast everyone; segment.
A practical segmentation example (actionable): export subscribers (or pull via API) and tag “engaged” vs “cold” based on last activity. Even if you do it outside the platform, the logic is simple.
# Minimal example: mark subscribers as engaged if they opened/clicked in last 30 days
import csv
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
cutoff = datetime.utcnow() - timedelta(days=30)
with open("subscribers.csv", newline="") as f, open("segmented.csv", "w", newline="") as out:
r = csv.DictReader(f)
fieldnames = r.fieldnames + ["segment"]
w = csv.DictWriter(out, fieldnames=fieldnames)
w.writeheader()
for row in r:
last = row.get("last_activity", "")
try:
last_dt = datetime.fromisoformat(last.replace("Z", "+00:00"))
except Exception:
last_dt = None
row["segment"] = "engaged" if last_dt and last_dt >= cutoff else "cold"
w.writerow(row)
Upload the segmented list (or apply tags via your ESP’s API) and send different campaigns:
- Engaged: product updates, launches, upsells.
- Cold: re-engagement series, preference center, or suppress to protect deliverability.
Tools don’t fix strategy, but better segmentation UX makes good strategy easier to execute.
Which one should you pick (and when to switch)?
Pick MailerLite if you want a clean editor, simple automations, and pricing that won’t surprise you as your list grows. It’s a strong default for indie hackers, early-stage SaaS, and teams that just want email to work.
Pick Mailchimp if you want an all-in-one marketing suite feel, richer templates, and you’re okay paying more as you scale—or your org already runs on Mailchimp and switching costs are real.
Soft guidance (no hard sell): if you’re still unsure, try building the same onboarding sequence in both tools. The one that lets you ship faster (with fewer “wait, where is that setting?” moments) is usually the right call. If neither feels flexible enough, that’s your signal to evaluate something like ActiveCampaign, ConvertKit, or Brevo based on whether you prioritize automation depth, creator workflows, or multi-channel messaging.
