155
Points
68
Comments
speckx
Author

Top Comments

LercApr 20
I once watched a news report about the then tail end of the Ceaușescu regime. One of the indicators of the level of oppression they described was that they had video cameras mounted on street lamps.
seydorApr 20
Militarism, surveillance, propaganda, statism. Reminds me of something. Are we the baddies now ?
rapnieApr 20
Blog got the hug of death, I think. Archive link: https://archive.is/bpNAw
_doctor_loveApr 20
This is all well and good but as long as advertising is how folks make money on the web, the surveillance state will persist.
inventor7777Apr 20
When Apple first released App Tracking Transparency, I immediately used it to block the trackers and I have not even thought about it since because it is so simple and useful.

What a contrast to modern websites which require all sorts of weird clicking gymnastics to disable similar tracking.

nickandbroApr 20
Whenever I read your articles, I get distracted by the space invaders and just play that instead. Maybe this is a problem with me being a bit ADHD, but I feel like I am not the only one
dataflowApr 20
Sorry to nitpick but tracking and surveillance are not the same thing. Go back to the last century for a second, before all this 21st-century tech came along. Just because your cell phone and towers would be able to track what rough region (let's call it "site") you were visiting, that doesn't mean they were surveilling you.

Surveillance implies things about bith intended usage and actual usage, etc. that -- simply put -- do not need to hold when you're tracking something. If the argument is genuinely that cookies have genuinely been used to place us under surveillance rather than mere tracking -- I have nothing inherently against it, but you need to support it with evidence. Simply pointing to the fact that they track some fact or metric that indirectly relates to you is not sufficient evidence of that.

And to be clear, I'm not saying I like tracking or we should be fine with it. I hate it too. But it's also a turnoff seeing people smearing one thing as another, and I don't think it's a great strategy to help win support for your cause.

righthandApr 20
WHATWG wants to co-mingle document rendering with javascript (this is the real reason they are removing XSLT and not proposing a replacement, it skirts this enforcement) so that when you try to disable javascript or block tracking it breaks the document rendering, leaving the only option to leave Javascript enabled and ad blockers off. Other protocols gemini, gopher etc don’t have the same issues because they’re already excluding Javascript.

What is really needed is a hard fork of major browsers by a grass roots community to advance HTML standards to include partial template rendering solutions without the reliance on Javascript.

Of course this is a startup forum so the response is just going to be wittled down to observations about economic value. However if users start to change/fight then the economics will too.

Visit the Original Link

Read the full content on vivianvoss.net

Source
vivianvoss.net
Author
speckx
Posted
April 20, 2026 at 04:34 PM


More Top Stories

qwen.ai Apr 20
Qwen3.6-Max-Preview: Smarter, Sharper, Still Evolving
367202 commentsby mfiguiere
Details
opensource.posit.co Apr 20
ggsql: A Grammar of Graphics for SQL
26962 commentsby thomasp85
Details
awesomeagents.ai Apr 20
GitHub's Fake Star Economy
587316 commentsby Liriel
Details
kimi.com Apr 20
Kimi K2.6: Advancing Open-Source Coding
374181 commentsby meetpateltech
Details
mastodon.social Apr 19
10 years ago, someone wrote a test for Servo that included an expiry in 2026
13382 commentsby luu
Details
sr.ht Apr 17
Kefir C17/C23 Compiler
402 commentsby conductor
Details
👋 Need help with code?