Push button switches may look similar from the outside, but their internal behavior can be very different.
One of the most important distinctions is whether the switch is momentary or latching. Choosing the wrong type can create unexpected behavior in the finished product, even when the footprint and electrical configuration appear correct.
Understanding where the switching state should be stored is the simplest way to make the right choice.
What Is a Momentary Push Button Switch
A momentary switch remains active only while the actuator is being pressed.
When the user releases the button, an internal spring returns the mechanism to its original position.
This behavior is common in:
reset buttons
menu controls
keypad inputs
test equipment
handheld electronics
control panels
In many modern products, the momentary switch simply sends a signal to a microcontroller. Firmware then determines what happens next.
For example, pressing a power button may tell the controller to turn a system on, even though the physical button immediately returns to its original position.
What Is a Latching Push Button Switch
A latching switch mechanically maintains its state after the user releases the button.
Press once and the switch changes state.
Press again and it returns.
This is why latching designs are also commonly described as push on push off or self locking switches.
A compact latching push button switch can be useful when the state needs to remain mechanically maintained rather than stored by software.
Typical applications include:
audio equipment
test instruments
control systems
consumer electronics
mode selection
hardware power control
The Main Difference Is Where the State Lives
This is the most useful way to compare the two technologies.
With a momentary switch, the physical button does not remember anything. The system usually remembers the state electronically.
With a latching switch, the mechanism itself maintains the state.
Consider a device with an electronic power button.
A momentary switch sends a short signal to the controller. The controller then decides whether to keep the system powered.
A mechanical latching switch can maintain the contact state even without a processor making that decision.
Neither approach is universally better.
The correct choice depends on the architecture of the product.
When Momentary Switching Is Better
A momentary switch is usually preferable when software already controls the system.
It provides several advantages.
The firmware can assign multiple functions to one button. A short press might perform one action while a long press performs another.
Behavior can also be changed through software without redesigning the switch mechanism.
Momentary tactile switches are therefore common in compact electronic interfaces. Engineers comparing tactile switch options can choose different sizes, mounting styles, operating forces and actuator heights depending on the design.
Momentary switching also works well when the external control needs to remain visually unchanged regardless of the system state.
When Latching Switching Is Better
Latching switches are useful when maintaining a physical state has value.
This can include equipment where users expect a clear mechanical on and off condition.
They can also be useful when electronic state retention would unnecessarily increase circuit complexity.
One important advantage is that the mechanical position can remain unchanged even when the device loses power.
However, designers should not assume every latching switch is suitable for switching mains power directly.
Electrical ratings, contact configuration and applicable safety requirements must still be checked for the specific component.
Do Not Identify the Switch by Appearance Alone
A common sourcing problem occurs when momentary and latching variants use nearly identical housings.
A buyer may receive a part that fits the PCB perfectly but operates differently.
This can be difficult to detect during basic incoming inspection.
The safer approach is to control the complete manufacturer part number in the BOM and include functional behavior in the inspection procedure.
A useful test is simple:
Press the switch.
Release it.
Check whether the electrical state remains changed.
Press it again.
Confirm whether the state returns.
A press and hold test cannot distinguish all momentary and latching variants.
Consider Travel and Enclosure Geometry
Latching mechanisms often need enough actuator travel to complete the locking and releasing sequence.
The external button or plastic cap must not prevent this movement.
This becomes important when a switch sits behind a custom enclosure.
Tolerance from several parts can accumulate:
PCB position
switch height
plastic button height
enclosure wall thickness
mounting hardware
An apparently small dimensional error can prevent reliable latching.
Prototype testing should therefore use the actual enclosure whenever possible.
Contact Configuration Still Matters
Mechanical behavior and electrical configuration are separate specifications.
A latching switch might use SPST, SPDT, DPDT or another contact arrangement depending on the design.
For example, a DPDT switch can change two circuits simultaneously.
Engineers should verify the contact diagram instead of assuming the pin configuration based only on the number of terminals.
Consider Lifecycle
A button used several times every hour requires a different lifecycle target from a configuration control changed only occasionally.
Estimate how frequently the user will operate the switch over the expected service life.
Then compare that requirement with the manufacturer's published mechanical and electrical life under relevant test conditions.
Electrical life can also depend heavily on the load being switched.
Final Thoughts
The choice between momentary and latching push button switches should begin with one question:
Should the mechanical switch maintain the state, or should the electronics maintain it?
Once that decision is clear, engineers can evaluate footprint, actuator travel, contact configuration, electrical rating and lifecycle.
Treating mechanical behavior as an explicit design requirement prevents one of the easiest switch selection mistakes to make.
