Today we turn to the newer, sometimes hyped technologies that are starting to appear around the game: augmented and virtual reality, blockchain experiments, digital collectibles and other emerging tools. The goal is not to chase every trend, but to separate what is genuinely useful from what is mostly noise.
AR and VR: Training and Fan Experience
Virtual reality is being used in some high-performance environments for cognitive training, decision-making drills and injury rehabilitation. Players can practise reading defensive lines or rehearsing set-piece moves in a controlled virtual space.
Augmented reality has clearer near-term potential for fans and coaches. Imagine pointing a phone at a pitch and seeing live player stats, historical try overlays or coaching annotations appear in the real world. Broadcasters and clubs are already experimenting with AR graphics that enhance rather than replace the live view.
From a developer’s perspective these applications combine:
- Real-time spatial tracking
- Lightweight 3D assets
- Careful UX so information does not overwhelm the action
A simple conceptual flow for an AR coaching overlay might look like:
Camera frame
→ Detect pitch markings/players
→ Align virtual content to real-world coordinates
→ Render stats or diagrams with correct occlusion
→ Update at interactive frame rates
The hard parts are robustness outdoors, battery life on mobile devices and designing overlays that coaches will actually trust during a session.
Blockchain, NFTs and Digital Ownership
In recent years there have been experiments with:
- Digital collectibles of iconic moments or player cards
- Ticketing systems that aim to reduce fraud
- Fan engagement platforms that reward attendance or participation
- Attempts at transparent ownership of digital collectibles.
Some of these projects delivered interesting technical proofs of concept. Many struggled with user experience, market timing, or unclear value for ordinary fans and clubs. The underlying questions remain useful for developers:
- When does a shared, append-only ledger actually solve a problem that a well-designed database cannot?
- How do you design digital ownership so it feels meaningful rather than speculative?
- What happens to the data and the community when the hype cycle moves on?
For most rugby organisations the practical wins still come from reliable identity, ticketing and content systems rather than from putting every highlight on-chain.
Other Emerging Areas Worth Watching
- Digital twins of players or sessions - combining GPS, video and medical data into models that help manage load and recovery.
- Advanced materials and smart textiles - clothing that senses impact or muscle activation more comfortably than today’s add-on devices.
- Better low-cost computer vision - continuing the themes from Post 5, but running on edge devices that clubs can actually afford.
- Personalised fan experiences - using data (with consent) to surface relevant highlights, training content or community features.
Signal vs Noise: A Practical Filter for Developers
When evaluating any new technology in a sports context, ask:
- Does it solve a real pain point for players, coaches or fans?
- Can it work in the messy conditions of real rugby (weather, contact, limited budgets)?
- Is the value clear without requiring users to understand the underlying tech?
- What is the long-term cost of maintaining the system and the data?
- Who owns the data and the relationship with the user?
Technologies that survive these questions tend to stick. The others become case studies.
Personal Reflection
I have watched several waves of “the future of sport” technology arrive with big claims. The ones that lasted were usually the ones that made someone’s actual job easier - a coach reviewing sessions faster, a player understanding their load better, a fan feeling closer to the club. The technology itself was secondary to the outcome.
That remains a good compass. Build things people need, not just things that are possible.
