When a call for donations triggers a torrent of online hate simply because the fundraiser is Ukrainian, the mechanics of humanitarian aid are breaking down.
That's the reality for Nastya Podorozhnya, 29, who founded the Martynka helpline and shelter for Ukrainian women refugees escaping violence. Four years into a war where Poland was the primary safe harbor, her organization is fighting for survival as funding evaporates and hostility grows, according to ABC International. What began as a grassroots bulwark against human trafficking now represents a critical fault line in Europe’s refugee response, where political narratives are directly imperiling the most vulnerable.
Why Martynka Is a Bellwether for Anti-Refugee Sentiment
The story of support turning to suspicion is not abstract. In the first weeks of Russia's full-scale invasion on Feb. 24, 2022, Poland welcomed 3.5 million Ukrainians with open homes and government benefits. By the end of that year, around one million settled there, with more than 70% finding employment and contributing an estimated 2.7% to Poland’s GDP in 2024.
But the tone shifted decisively during the 2025 Polish presidential campaign. Research shows Ukrainian migrants identified that period as the moment anti-Ukrainian feeling intensified across the political spectrum, not just from the far right. The eventual winner, Karol Nawrocki, pledged to prioritize Poles over Ukrainians for public services. His liberal rival, Rafał Trzaskowski, proposed restricting child welfare benefits for Ukrainians.
Political rhetoric turned to measurable harm. Polish police data shows 180 Ukrainian citizens were victims of prejudice-motivated crimes by mid-July this year. That figure is on pace to surpass the 275 incidents for all of 2025.
“And it's not only negative feelings, Ukrainians really experience hostile conversations and attacks,” researcher Olena Babakova told the AP.
For Martynka, which provides medical care, jobs, and housing for over 100 women and children, this climate means every public appeal for support is a risk. Podorozhnya’s simple explanation: “It’s because I’m Ukrainian.”
How Online Hate Fuels a Real-World Funding Crisis
The abuse is not a parallel problem. It’s a direct operational threat that starves essential services.
Martynka is caught in a perfect storm of withdrawing support.
- State Aid: The Polish government has been steadily cutting support, arguing many refugees have stabilized. The state ombudsman warns this disproportionately hits single mothers, the elderly, and the disabled.
- International Donors: Global attention has moved on. The U.N. refugee agency reports only half its identified needs for Ukrainians are financed this year, compared to 94% in 2022.
- Local Backlash: The online vitriol scares off potential donors and complicates community partnerships, strangling the grassroots lifeline that remains.
Budgetary Impact: Every euro lost to donor fatigue or fear means the shelter's inconspicuous two-bedroom apartment in Krakow nears closure.
Programmatic Strain: The mission has expanded from its original focus. “Not only victims of violence contact the helpline now,” said Martynka worker Sonia Novytska, “but also mothers struggling to provide food and shelter for their children.” The helpline fielded about 1,800 requests for help last year, and expects more.
This mirrors a wider crisis in innovation under duress. Just as a fintech platform faces collapse without user trust and capital, a humanitarian venture fails without community trust and funding. It's reminiscent of the desperate restructuring seen when a platform like BitMart Reverses Shutdown In Dramatic Survival Bid | XOOMAR.
The Dual Burden of Running a Shelter Under Siege
Podorozhnya’s daily reality illustrates the immense personal cost of filling systemic gaps. Her work starts with trauma-informed care over tea in the shelter’s kitchen, sharing her own experience of a man trying to rape her in Poland in 2016. “They tell me what happened to them and I say ‘girl, same,’” she told the AP.
But her role extends far beyond counselor. She is now a public defender of her community’s right to exist in safety.
Strategy 1: Framing the Work as a Common Good
She makes a pragmatic, almost transactional, case for support: “What Poles need to understand is that we are helping the people that could otherwise become homeless in their neighborhoods, the people who might start abusing substances out of despair they can’t make ends meet.” In her words, “Martynka does the job of the Polish state.”
Strategy 2: Navigating Political Escalation
Her work collides with high-level diplomatic fractures. This past June, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s decision to name a unit after a WWII-era paramilitary group accused of massacring Poles sparked outrage. President Nawrocki withdrew a state honor from Zelenskyy in response. This political tension further legitimizes the hostile environment her shelter operates within.
Poland's Shift Is a European Stress Test
The struggle of a single shelter in Krakow is a concentrated preview of a continent-wide challenge.
Poland is not an outlier in experiencing solidarity fatigue. The convergence of economic anxiety, historical grievances, and political opportunism seen here is replicable across Europe as temporary protection schemes are reviewed.
Critical Insight: The backlash is intensifying even as the war grows “deadlier,” as Martynka’s Novytska notes, and even as the refugee population has proven economically beneficial. This disconnect reveals that the crisis is no longer about resource capacity but political will and social narrative.
The Polish government defends its pullback. Deputy Minister Katarzyna Nowakowska states the most vulnerable still get direct state help, and others should turn to social workers. Yet NGOs like Ukrainian House report “increasingly supporting people who are particularly vulnerable to exclusion.” The state’s safety net and the reality on the ground are drifting apart, leaving organizations like Martynka to bridge a widening gap with shrinking resources.
The Fraying Infrastructure of Compassion
Looking forward, the question isn't whether more shelters will struggle, but what fails when they do.
The Leverage Points
- Local Institutions: Can municipal governments or community groups provide discreet, targeted support shielded from national political debates? This often requires a form of local political courage.
- International NGOs: Will they recommit to flexible, long-term funding for frontline groups, recognizing that the acute phase of displacement has transitioned to a protracted integration crisis?
- Grassroots Networks: Their survival depends on secure funding channels and legal protections against harassment, the unglamorous "hard" infrastructure of aid.
XOOMAR Analysis: The Martynka case shows that when compassion becomes contested political ground, the first casualties are the most vulnerable: single mothers, survivors of violence, children. The shelter’s fight underscores a non-negotiable truth. The infrastructure of human kindness in wartime requires relentless, mundane maintenance, paying rent, securing food, answering helplines. When that is undermined by targeted hatred and official indifference, the failure is not humanitarian. It's political.
The path forward for Poland, and for Europe, hinges on whether it can separate essential human protection from the volatile currency of political campaigns. The women at Martynka, and countless others, are waiting for that answer. Their survival, quite literally, depends on it.
Impact Analysis
- It shows how political campaigns targeting refugees translate into real-world violence, threatening the safety of vulnerable populations.
- The erosion of humanitarian funding due to rising hostility jeopardizes critical services like Martynka that protect women from trafficking and violence.
- It indicates a potential failure in Europe's refugee support system, where economic contributions from migrants are overshadowed by political narratives, risking social stability.
Originally published on XOOMAR. For more news and analysis, visit XOOMAR.
