Tokenization Hype Hits Wall Street’s Plumbing Problem

Tokenization hype is running ahead of Wall Street’s operating reality, and Ophelia Snyder is right to call it out before the industry sells pilots as infrastructure.

The former 21Shares co-founder told CoinDesk’s Jennifer Sanasie on Public Keys that tokenization can solve real problems around settlement rails and moving assets, but the harder work is connecting blockchain-based assets to the systems banks, brokerages and asset managers already use, according to CoinDesk. That distinction matters. A token can move quickly. A financial institution cannot simply pretend its books, records, controls, reporting obligations and risk models moved with it.

Wall Street’s tokenization push needs plumbing before promises

The honest case for tokenization is strong. Faster settlement and cleaner asset movement are not cosmetic upgrades. They attack real friction inside finance, where assets often move through layered systems that were not built for blockchain-native transactions.

But the current sales pitch often jumps from “the token moved” to “Wall Street is ready.” Snyder’s warning cuts through that. She argues that crypto and traditional finance are talking past each other. Crypto firms have improved transaction throughput, but institutional finance still has to integrate those assets into operational machinery that was built for a different market structure.

That’s the gap. Tokenized funds, bonds and real-world assets may become useful tools. The danger is marketing them as a finished Wall Street rewrite before the boring systems can handle stress, volume and accountability.

XOOMAR has covered adjacent efforts such as Citi Digital Depositary Receipts Drag Private Shares Onchain and Cuomo Pushes ICE OKX Deal Into Wall Street's Crypto Fight. Those stories belong in the same conversation: the fight is no longer whether traditional finance will test blockchain rails. It’s whether those rails can survive contact with institutional process.

Tokenized assets can move faster, but settlement is only one piece of the machine

Settlement is the easy headline because it’s visible. A blockchain transaction can show ownership moving in a way that looks cleaner than legacy post-trade workflows. Snyder accepts that tokenization solves real problems around settlement rails and moving assets.

Her sharper point is that many discussions skip the work that happens after a trade is executed and before assets are fully settled. That is where institutions live. Books and records have to match. Compliance workflows have to run. Regulatory reporting has to be produced. Risk teams have to understand what changed, when it changed and who carries exposure.

A pilot can prove that a token moves. A market has to prove much more.

Snyder’s line on scale is the one the industry should print out and tape to every tokenization pitch deck:

"A billion dollars is nothing when it comes to traditional financial flows," Snyder said.

That quote is not anti-tokenization. It’s anti-delusion.

Institutions won’t tokenize serious flows until controls are airtight

The core infrastructure problem is not whether a blockchain can process transactions. Snyder says blockchain firms have largely addressed transaction throughput. The harder question is whether tokenized assets fit into the systems that financial institutions already depend on.

That means books and records systems, compliance workflows and regulatory reporting. It also means risk management frameworks that can handle assets trading around the clock. Traditional finance has controls built around operating assumptions. If tokenized assets change those assumptions, the controls have to change too.

There is another practical choke point: third-party software. Snyder said many firms rely on providers that have not yet adapted their systems for blockchain-native transactions. That matters because banks and asset managers do not rebuild their operating stack on a whim. If the vendors in the middle are not ready, adoption slows no matter how elegant the blockchain layer looks.

This is where tokenization hype gets careless. Moving large amounts of digital bearer assets on behalf of clients requires more oversight and controls than existing book-entry systems, according to Snyder. That is not a minor implementation detail. It is the difference between a clever product and institutional infrastructure.

Tokenization hype risks repeating crypto’s old mistake

Crypto’s recurring error is confusing technical possibility with market readiness. Tokenization is at risk of doing the same thing.

Wall Street does not adopt infrastructure because it sounds elegant. It adopts infrastructure when it reduces risk or cost without creating larger operational problems. Snyder’s argument lands because it focuses on the hidden middle of finance: the processes between execution and final settlement that rarely make conference slides but decide whether a system can be trusted.

The strongest promoters of tokenization hype often lean on words like efficiency and access. Fine. Those are real goals. But they can also hide the hard questions: Who controls the workflow? What happens when systems disagree? How do institutions report, supervise and manage tokenized assets when markets do not sleep?

Overpromising would be costly. If early institutional projects disappoint once they leave pilot mode, the backlash could slow adoption of tools that deserve a serious place in modern finance. The better path is less theater and more integration.

The best counterargument: Wall Street is building real tokenization products now

The strongest case against Snyder’s caution is that institutions are no longer treating tokenization as a crypto science project. CoinDesk’s own news feed around the same period included tokenization-adjacent headlines involving Securitize and tZERO, Anchorage, and OKX and NYSE, alongside Snyder’s interview. The direction of travel is obvious: serious firms are testing where blockchain rails can fit.

That momentum deserves respect. Legacy financial infrastructure can be slow and fragmented. If tokenization improves settlement and asset movement, institutions have a reason to keep investing, especially if the new systems eventually reduce operational drag.

But momentum is not maturity. Blue-chip interest validates the opportunity. It does not prove the operating model is ready for broad adoption. Snyder’s point is that the next phase will test whether tokenized infrastructure can operate in the critical path of major financial firms, not just at the edge of innovation teams.

That is the standard that matters. Not announcements. Not demos. Production.

Wall Street should build tokenization standards before chasing tokenized everything

The practical agenda is clear. Institutions need software that connects blockchain infrastructure with existing controls, or existing providers need to adapt their products to support new transaction methods. Snyder identified both paths. She also warned that either route will take time, especially because many institutions are still completing cloud migration efforts.

That means the industry should stop racing to tokenize everything and focus on the pieces that make adoption durable:

• Integration: Blockchain-based assets must plug into books, records, reporting and compliance workflows.
• Risk controls: Firms need frameworks for assets that can trade around the clock.
• Vendor readiness: Third-party providers have to support blockchain-native transactions.
• Scale testing: Projects must prove they can handle flows that matter in U.S. capital markets.
• Client oversight: Digital bearer assets require controls that match the risks of moving large values for clients.

Snyder expects the hardest challenges to appear as firms move beyond pilot programs. That is exactly where the hype will either become infrastructure or collapse into another crypto slogan.

The winners in tokenization won’t be the loudest promoters. They’ll be the firms patient enough to make the infrastructure invisible, dependable and dull. Wall Street should demand that before it buys the revolution.

Disclaimer: This XOOMAR analysis is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not financial, investment, legal, tax, or professional advice. It does not provide buy, sell, hold, price-target, portfolio, or personalized recommendations. Verify information independently and consult qualified professionals before making decisions.

The Bottom Line

• Tokenization could improve settlement and asset movement, but only if it connects to existing financial infrastructure.
• Overhyping pilots as production-ready systems risks misleading investors and institutions.
• Wall Street adoption will depend on operational integration, not just blockchain transaction speed.

Originally published on XOOMAR. For more news and analysis, visit XOOMAR.