We spent time breaking down Matt Gray's Content Waterfall system after seeing it cited repeatedly by operators who were drowning in their own publishing schedules. What Gray built to escape a breaking production pace is one of the more practical distribution frameworks we've seen come through a newsletter, and it maps directly onto what the operators we work with are trying to solve.
Gray's answer to the "post everywhere, burn out completely" problem is a single-piece-of-content-to-28-outputs system he calls the Content Waterfall. One long-form anchor piece, distributed and adapted across every platform, run by a team rather than the founder. The underlying logic: create once from your actual thinking, then let format adaptation do the multiplying. For operators building inbound on LinkedIn specifically, the framework clarifies where video fits and why producing it free upfront compounds faster than most other content bets.
Where the 18 months actually started
Gray's origin story is worth taking seriously because it's not the usual "I decided to build a personal brand" framing. He quit alcohol and weed, started journaling to process it, and the journal entries became tweets. Tweets became newsletters. Newsletters became videos.
By month 12, posting seven days a week across four platforms, he hit the familiar wall: ideas weren't coming as fast as the schedule demanded. That's the production trap most operators recognize. The answer isn't to post less. It's to change the unit of production.
The Content Waterfall in plain terms
Gray's system starts with one long-form piece. For him that's usually an X thread or a newsletter issue. The anchor can be anything with enough substance to carry a full idea: a podcast episode, a detailed LinkedIn post, a YouTube video.
From that one anchor, the system produces:
- 3 Instagram Reels
- 3 YouTube Shorts
- 3 TikTok videos
- 3 X videos
- 10 X posts
- 1 newsletter
- 1 Instagram carousel
- 1 LinkedIn article
- 1 long-form YouTube video
That's 28 pieces from one core idea. And the distribution isn't mechanical copy-paste. Each platform gets a version adapted to its format and tone. X gets the compressed, punchy take. LinkedIn gets the framework version. Instagram gets the visual story. Same thinking, different shape.
The part that makes this sustainable: Gray's team runs the system without him. He documents his thinking once. They execute the distribution.
Why video is load-bearing in this stack
Of those 28 outputs, video accounts for 10. That's not incidental. Video is where free content compounds fastest for operators trying to build inbound pipeline, for a specific reason: it's the hardest format for AI tools to replicate convincingly at scale for someone who isn't yet widely known.
Text posts and AI carousels are flooded; video showing a founder's actual voice and reasoning still breaks through.
The operators we audit who generate the most consistent inbound from LinkedIn tend to have one thing in common: they have an existing production surface (a podcast, a YouTube channel, a regular Loom habit) and they're just not redistributing it. The video already exists. It's sitting in a folder. Gray's system is essentially a forcing function to get it into the channels where it earns attention.
The GPS framework underneath the system
Gray calls the three-part operating structure the Content GPS. The labels are doing real work.
Generate from your genius zone. Map your expertise into four content pillars. Every post you write falls into one of those categories. For Gray, the four are Systems, Team, AI, and Freedom. The pillars eliminate daily decision fatigue. You're not staring at a blank page wondering what to post; you're choosing which of four areas to go deep on today.
Produce once, publish everywhere. This is the Content Waterfall mechanic described above. The production unit is the anchor piece. Everything else is execution downstream.
Systematize so the founder isn't the bottleneck. This is the piece most operators skip. Gray documents his thinking once. The team adapts and distributes. The founder stays in generation and gets out of production.
What this means for LinkedIn-first operators
Most of the operators we work with are building inbound through LinkedIn specifically, not across six platforms simultaneously. Gray's framework scales down cleanly.
The anchor piece for a LinkedIn-focused operator might be a detailed post, a short LinkedIn video, or a newsletter issue. The cascade for LinkedIn alone could look like: one long-form post, two or three short-form posts pulling out specific insights, one video clip, one comment thread worth of engagement. That's five or six pieces from one core idea, and the production time drops significantly once the system is running.
The content pillars principle applies regardless of platform count. If you can name four areas where you have genuine expertise and genuine opinions, you have an indefinite content runway. The founders we've audited who run out of things to say usually haven't done the pillar mapping. They're improvising every week instead of drawing from a mapped territory. For cadence specifics, Welsh's LinkedIn strategy breakdown and the patterns across top creators each document how constraint sharpens output.
The honest limitation
Gray's system is built for someone with a team, or someone moving toward one. The "my team runs this without me" piece isn't an aside; it's structural to why the system doesn't break down.
Solo operators can run a scaled-back version of the waterfall, and many do. But if you're producing 28 pieces from every anchor and executing them yourself, you've just created a more elaborate version of the original problem. The system works when the founder stays in the G phase (generation) and delegates P and S.
The practical entry point for most operators we talk to: start with the pillar mapping. Four topics, real expertise, actual opinions. Then build one anchor piece per week. Then figure out how many cascade pieces you can produce without breaking down. Most people land somewhere between five and ten, which is more than enough to compound LinkedIn inbound over 90 days.
The 2.8 million number in context
It's worth being clear about what that audience size does and doesn't mean for operators reading this. Gray built a consumer-oriented creator audience across entertainment-adjacent platforms. The scale of 2.8 million is a B2C outcome.
The mechanics transfer regardless of scale. A 5,000-person LinkedIn following of exactly the right buyers doesn't require 2.8 million, it requires the same pillar system, cascade structure, and founder-stays-in-generation discipline.
The operators we see building the most consistent inbound pipeline are the ones who treat distribution as a function with a system behind it, not a task they fit in when they have energy left.
FAQ
What is the Content Waterfall system and how does it work?
The Content Waterfall is a distribution framework where one long-form anchor piece (a newsletter, podcast episode, or detailed post) gets adapted into 28 or more platform-specific outputs. The anchor provides the core idea; the cascade handles format adaptation for each channel. X gets a compressed version, LinkedIn gets a framework post, Instagram gets the visual story. The goal is to stop creating from scratch every day and instead multiply one well-developed idea across every platform.
How can solo founders use the Content Waterfall without a team?
Solo operators can run a scaled-down version. The practical entry point is pillar mapping: identify four areas where you have real expertise and real opinions, then build one anchor piece per week. From that anchor, produce however many cascade pieces you can handle sustainably, typically five to ten. The constraint that matters is staying in generation mode (your thinking, your voice) and minimizing time in production mode (editing, scheduling, formatting). Even five pieces from one anchor beats five disconnected posts created from scratch each time.
Why does free video content help build pipeline faster than text alone?
Across the profiles we audit, video is harder to replicate convincingly with AI at scale. Text posts and carousels get flooded with generated content, which makes genuine expertise harder to distinguish. Short-form video that shows a founder's actual voice, cadence, and reasoning still breaks through because viewers recognize the difference between performed expertise and real expertise. For operators building inbound, video builds trust faster per piece of content than text equivalents, which means pipeline compounds more quickly over 90 days.
How do content pillars reduce burnout for founders posting on LinkedIn?
Content pillars eliminate daily decision fatigue by pre-defining the territory you operate in. If you have four mapped topics, every post is a choice within a known space rather than an invention from nothing. The mental load of 'what do I post today' drops significantly when the answer is always one of four areas. Gray uses Systems, Team, AI, and Freedom as his four. The specific labels matter less than the act of mapping them in advance, which turns an infinite creative problem into a constrained, sustainable one.
This article was first published on the Chime blog. For more on LinkedIn pipeline tactics, visit the Chime blog.
