After the Smyrtos boarding, sanctioned tankers appeared to swerve away from the English Channel. Forwarder, a Russian shadow fleet tanker, just sailed in anyway.
The Russian-flagged vessel entered the Channel on Wednesday evening after leaving Primorsk on 12 June with oil loaded, according to BBC World. Its stated destination is Dongying, China. That single transit now tests a harder question than whether Britain can seize one stateless tanker: whether Western governments are willing, or legally able, to act against a sanctioned vessel flying the Russian flag.
Forwarder turns Russian shadow fleet enforcement into a live test
The expectation after Smyrtos was simple: sanctioned vessels would avoid the Channel, at least for now. BBC Verify says ship-tracking data showed several UK-sanctioned tankers altering course after Smyrtos was intercepted, with many apparently taking an alternate route around the west coast of Ireland.
Forwarder broke that pattern.
This matters because Russian shadow fleet tanker enforcement is no longer only about sanctions lists or distant routing data. It is now about legal thresholds at sea. The UK has said its armed forces can board sanctioned vessels passing through UK waters if they are not operating in accordance with international law. But Forwarder presents a more difficult case than Smyrtos.
Forwarder is sanctioned by the UK, US and EU. It has changed its name twice since the British government accused it of smuggling oil from Russia. Yet BBC Verify reports it is flying the Russian flag, and experts said that makes interception less likely.
That is the tension. Smyrtos showed capability. Forwarder is testing restraint.
"Any target ship will be individually considered by law enforcement, military and energy market specialists before an operation is executed," an MoD spokesperson told BBC Verify.
Forwarder, Primorsk and the Channel route define the risk
The hard facts are narrow but important.
| Item | Forwarder | Smyrtos |
|---|---|---|
| Reported status | Russian-flagged sanctioned tanker | Sailing without a registered flag, according to BBC Verify |
| Recent route | Left Primorsk on 12 June, entered Channel Wednesday evening | Boarded on Sunday morning |
| Cargo context | Satellite imagery showed it left Primorsk after loading oil | Source reports it was seized while transiting |
| Legal posture | Flagged by Russia, no information in source suggesting false flag | Cameroon registry had delisted it before Channel transit, according to analyst Mark Douglas |
| Current reported status | Sailing south, broadcasting Dongying, China | Held by UK officials off Weymouth, captain charged with contravening sanctions |
Primorsk is central to the story because BBC Verify describes it as the largest refinery in the Baltic Sea and a critical export hub for Russia's energy industry. A departure from there, after loading oil, gives sanctions monitors a clear reason to watch the vessel.
The broader scale is also documented. The MoD says the shadow fleet has more than 700 ageing tankers and carries 75% of Russia's sanctioned oil. In May, BBC Verify found that almost 200 shadow fleet vessels had passed through the Channel in the months after Sir Keir Starmer's March statement. In at least 94 cases, ships briefly crossed into UK territorial waters, which extend up to 12 nautical miles from the coast.
Those numbers explain why one Russian shadow fleet tanker can matter. The Channel is not an edge case in this enforcement story. It has been a repeated route.
Smyrtos changed the mood, but Forwarder changes the legal problem
Smyrtos gave the UK a cleaner legal pathway. Royal Marines and National Crime Agency officers boarded and seized the vessel because it was sailing without a registered flag in breach of international law, BBC Verify reports. The ship is now held off Weymouth, and its captain has been charged with contravening sanctions.
Forwarder is different.
Frederik Van Lokeren, a former Belgian naval officer and maritime analyst, told BBC Verify that acting against Forwarder would be a higher escalation point.
"Going after vessels that are falsely flagged or misusing a flag of convenience is one thing, but this would be going after Russia directly which would be a further step up in escalation," Van Lokeren said.
He added:
"Since this is a Russian-flagged vessel, possibly escorted by a Russian warship, I don't expect the UK, or any other Western country, to attempt to board her," Van Lokeren said.
Mark Douglas of Starboard Maritime Intelligence made the same distinction from a legal angle. Smyrtos had been delisted by the Cameroon registry before it sailed through the Channel, giving authorities reasonable grounds to suspect the vessel was without nationality. Forwarder, he said, is flagged by Russia.
That difference is the core of the story. Sanctions status alone does not appear to create the same operational opening as statelessness or a false flag.
HMS Tyne, Admiral Grigorovich and the risk of escalation
The military backdrop is visible but incomplete. The MoD would not comment on Forwarder or "on specific operational planning", saying public comment could limit its "ability to successfully take action against these ships". BBC Verify said ship-tracking data appeared to show HMS Tyne operating near Forwarder's location.
A NATO official previously told BBC Verify that the Russian warship Admiral Grigorovich had been assigned to escort sanctioned oil tankers. It is unclear whether it is accompanying Forwarder. The same warship was involved in a Tuesday incident in which it fired warning shots toward a British yacht that had apparently moved toward it in the Channel. As of Wednesday evening, a NATO official said Admiral Grigorovich had not moved far from the location of that incident.
That sequence narrows the space for easy enforcement. A boarding of a stateless tanker is one thing. A boarding of a Russian-flagged tanker, possibly near a Russian warship, is another.
XOOMAR analysis: Forwarder's transit is useful to Moscow even if nothing dramatic happens. If Western forces monitor but do not board, Russia can keep using legally protected grey areas around flag status. If Western forces do board, the confrontation risk rises. Either outcome tests where the enforcement line really sits.
Governments want disruption without a Channel confrontation
For London and its allies, the goal is to disrupt sanctions evasion without creating an unsafe encounter in crowded European waters. The BBC source does not report reactions from shipowners, insurers, brokers or banks, so claims about their specific behavior would go beyond the record.
Still, the practical implication is clear from the facts reported: documentation and flag status now carry operational weight. Smyrtos was vulnerable because its registration status created a legal basis for boarding. Forwarder is harder because it is Russian-flagged, despite sanctions and opaque ownership.
Before and after Smyrtos, the enforcement picture shifted:
- Before Smyrtos: Channel passages by shadow fleet vessels were frequent, with almost 200 identified by BBC Verify after Starmer's March announcement.
- After Smyrtos: multiple sanctioned tankers altered course away from the Channel.
- With Forwarder: at least one sanctioned Russian-flagged ship has re-entered the route, forcing authorities to decide whether monitoring is enough.
That is the new reality. Enforcement pressure can deter some voyages, but it does not automatically stop vessels with stronger flag-state protection.
The next Russian shadow fleet tanker passages decide whether Smyrtos was a warning
Forwarder's journey does not prove the UK will back down, and it does not prove Russia can move every sanctioned cargo without cost. It proves something narrower: the Smyrtos seizure did not close the Channel to all sanctioned traffic.
The next evidence to watch is concrete. Do more UK-sanctioned vessels return to the Channel, or do most keep routing around Ireland? Does the UK act only when vessels are stateless or falsely flagged, or does it test a broader legal theory against Russian-flagged ships? Does Admiral Grigorovich continue to appear near sanctioned tanker movements?
If future passages look like Forwarder's, Smyrtos may be remembered as a targeted operation against a legally exposed ship. If more vessels are stopped, delayed or diverted, it will look like the start of a sharper maritime enforcement phase.
For now, the Channel has become a pressure point in sanctions enforcement. Forwarder made that visible.
Impact Analysis
- Forwarder’s transit challenges Western enforcement of sanctions against Russia’s shadow fleet.
- Its Russian flag raises the legal and diplomatic risks of any interception.
- The case may influence whether sanctioned tankers avoid or resume using the English Channel.
Originally published on XOOMAR. For more news and analysis, visit XOOMAR.
