Report-preparation resource: doctor visit pain summary template
In sensitive apps, the export button is not just a feature.
It is a boundary.
If you want privacy-first, offline health tech to exist without surveillance funding it: sponsor the build → https://github.com/sponsors/CrisisCore-Systems
Before export, the data is private context.
After export, it can become evidence, explanation, documentation, or exposure.
Most apps treat export as a convenience feature. CSV, PDF, JSON, print, share. Done.
But in health-adjacent software, export deserves more respect. A pain report may include medication notes, sleep problems, work limitations, mental strain, functional changes, and details the user may not want automatically shared.
PainTracker's report flow is built around a simple idea:
the user decides what leaves their control.
Export changes the privacy state
Before export, the record may be local and private.
After export, it becomes portable.
It can be shown, sent, printed, uploaded, forwarded, stored in a folder, attached to a message, or interpreted by someone else.
That transition matters because the data has changed context. A note that was useful privately can become sensitive in a clinic, workplace, insurance, school, housing, or legal setting.
The app should treat that movement as intentional, not incidental.
Auto-sharing is not always user-friendly
Automatic sharing often sounds convenient.
It can also create risk.
Avoid making sensitive export flows depend on:
- silent provider access
- automatic insurer access
- employer visibility
- hidden cloud copies
- unclear report destinations
- background uploads
- broad access that outlives the user's intent
For some products, connected sharing is necessary. For many patient-support tools, it is not.
The protective default is simple:
make the user-controlled export good enough before adding automatic data pipelines.
Patient-generated does not mean clinically authoritative
This distinction matters.
A PainTracker report is patient-reported context.
It can support discussion.
It is not a diagnosis, treatment plan, or medical record. It does not replace clinical judgment or formal documentation.
That limitation should be visible. If a report can be misunderstood as institutional or clinical output, the product has created a truthfulness problem.
The label should travel with the file:
patient-generated summary.
Not official record.
Not provider-verified finding.
What a useful export should do
A useful patient-generated report should be:
- readable
- time-bounded
- clearly labeled
- easy to skim
- honest about source
- controlled by the user
- not overloaded with charts that do not help the reader
The point is not to produce a dramatic artifact.
The point is to help the user carry clearer context into a conversation.
PainTracker's report philosophy
A good pain report should help answer practical questions:
- What changed?
- How often?
- How severe?
- Where?
- What triggered it?
- What did it interfere with?
- What should the patient remember to ask?
That is enough.
The report does not need to become a portal, a provider dashboard, or a remote monitoring system to be useful.
It can remain a patient-controlled document.
Export UX checklist
Before shipping export in a sensitive app, ask:
[ ] Does the user know what is included?
[ ] Does the user know where the file goes?
[ ] Can the user review before sharing?
[ ] Is the report clearly labeled as patient-generated?
[ ] Are dates and context visible?
[ ] Is sensitive information minimized where possible?
[ ] Can the report be useful without giving anyone automatic access?
If the user cannot tell what leaves the app, export is not a consent boundary. It is a leakage path.
Why this matters for clinics
A clinic does not need system integration to benefit from clearer patient recall.
A patient can arrive with a readable summary. The clinic can review it like any other patient-provided document.
No portal.
No account.
No data pipeline.
That lower-burden model does not solve every clinical workflow problem, but it avoids asking clinics to manage a new system before the basic document has proven useful.
The useful takeaway
Export is where private data changes state.
Treat it with the same seriousness you would give any other consent boundary.
PainTracker's export flow is intentionally patient-controlled. The app does not automatically send reports to clinics, insurers, employers, or compensation systems.
Clinicians, developers, and privacy reviewers: the feedback I want is simple.
Would this kind of patient-generated summary be clear enough to review before or during an appointment?
Support this work
- Sponsor the project (primary): https://github.com/sponsors/CrisisCore-Systems
- Star the repo (secondary): https://github.com/CrisisCore-Systems/pain-tracker
