If you’re running apps on a VPS and wondering cloudflare r2 vs s3, the real question isn’t “which is better?”—it’s “which one fits my traffic pattern, egress profile, and operational tolerance?” For most VPS_HOSTING setups, storage cost is rarely the killer; bandwidth surprises and integration friction usually are.
What actually matters for VPS hosting object storage
When your compute lives on a VPS (think digitalocean, Hetzner, Linode, etc.), object storage is typically used for:
- Static assets (images, JS/CSS bundles)
- User uploads (avatars, attachments)
- Backups and archives
- Media delivery via a CDN
In practice, your decision hinges on four factors:
- Egress cost and predictability: Are you paying every time bytes leave the bucket?
- Latency to your VPS region: How far is your bucket from your server and users?
- Compatibility: Can your existing S3 tooling work unchanged?
- Operational constraints: IAM, logging, lifecycle policies, replication, and “boring” compliance stuff.
Cloudflare R2 vs Amazon S3: the blunt differences
Here’s the opinionated summary before the nuance:
- Amazon S3 is the default choice when you need mature features, deep AWS integration, and predictable enterprise ops.
- cloudflare R2 is compelling when egress is your enemy and you’re already serving users through Cloudflare’s network.
Key differences that show up quickly in VPS deployments:
- Egress pricing: S3 egress can dominate monthly bills when you serve lots of downloads directly. R2’s positioning is “no egress fees” (you still pay for storage and operations), which can be a big deal for asset-heavy apps.
- Ecosystem: S3 is the center of gravity for a massive tool ecosystem: lifecycle policies, replication options, event integrations, analytics, and third-party compatibility.
- S3 API compatibility: R2 supports an S3-compatible API, which means many S3 clients work. But “compatible” isn’t “identical,” and edge cases show up in advanced features.
If you’re hosting a web app on a VPS and using object storage mostly for public reads, egress tends to be the line item that either stays boring… or explodes.
Performance and architecture patterns that win
For VPS-hosted apps, a good architecture is usually “VPS for dynamic + object storage for blobs + CDN in front.”
Pattern A: R2 + Cloudflare cache (great for public assets)
If your users are global and your assets are cacheable, R2 paired with Cloudflare caching often behaves like “origin storage close to the edge.” The big win is not just cost—it’s reducing origin pulls and smoothing spikes.
This is especially attractive if your VPS provider is cost-optimized (for example, hetzner for compute) and you don’t want bandwidth bills elsewhere ruining the savings.
Pattern B: S3 + CloudFront (feature depth, predictable ops)
S3 + CloudFront is boring in the best way: mature features, strong controls, and well-understood behavior. If you need:
- Multi-region replication
- Fine-grained IAM and audit trails
- Tight integration with AWS services
…S3 is hard to beat.
Latency reality check
If your VPS is in a European datacenter and your storage is far away, your app will feel it on writes (uploads) and any uncached reads. You can mitigate reads with a CDN, but writes still traverse the network.
So pick regions deliberately, and don’t confuse “fast for users” with “fast for your backend.”
Hands-on: use the same S3 tooling against R2
One reason R2 is interesting for VPS folks is that you can often reuse the same S3 client libraries and CLI workflows.
Example: using the AWS CLI to upload a file to an S3-compatible endpoint (like R2). This is a practical way to test migration with minimal code changes:
# Configure credentials via environment variables for safety
export AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID="YOUR_ACCESS_KEY"
export AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY="YOUR_SECRET_KEY"
# Point the AWS CLI at your S3-compatible endpoint
# Replace with your provider endpoint and bucket name
aws --endpoint-url https://<accountid>.r2.cloudflarestorage.com \
s3 cp ./backup.tar.gz s3://my-bucket/backups/backup.tar.gz
What to validate in a VPS_HOSTING context:
- Upload/download speed from your VPS region
- Behavior of presigned URLs (if your app uses them)
- Multipart upload support for large files
- Your expected lifecycle rules (expiration, transitions) if you rely on them
If any of these are critical and behave differently, that’s your signal to either adjust architecture or stay with S3.
Decision checklist + soft recommendation
Use this quick checklist to decide:
- Choose S3 if you need advanced storage features, complex IAM/auditing, multi-region replication, or you’re already AWS-heavy.
- Choose cloudflare R2 if your workload is read-heavy, user-facing, cacheable, and you’re sensitive to egress cost volatility.
- If you’re on a VPS from providers like digitalocean or hetzner, measure end-to-end: VPS ↔ object storage latency plus CDN hit ratio. Don’t guess.
My take: for typical VPS-hosted web apps (SaaS dashboards, blogs, marketplaces) where object storage is mostly images, downloads, and static bundles, R2 is often the more forgiving choice financially—as long as your required feature set fits the “S3-compatible, not AWS-identical” reality.
If you’re already using Cloudflare for DNS/CDN/WAF, adding R2 can simplify your mental model and reduce billing surprises without forcing a full platform migration. If you’re not, S3 remains the safe baseline—especially when “it must work in every edge case” matters more than shaving bandwidth costs.
Some links in this article are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you if you make a purchase through them.
