Originally published on NextFuture
Today's briefing
The past 48 hours in AI × web dev have been dominated by one signal: coding agents are graduating from demo to production. Two substantial deep-dives landed on nextfuture — one mapping the macro arc of how agentic coding evolved in early 2026, the other giving engineers a practical scorecard for evaluating Cursor replacements. Taken together, they frame a moment where the tooling choices developers make now will shape team velocity for the rest of the year.
AI Tooling & Agents
AI coding agents in 2026 — a grounded fullstack recap. This in-depth recap covers where Claude Code, Copilot Workspace, and autonomous PR agents are genuinely delivering value, breaks down the real cost-per-PR across team sizes, and outlines the agent-in-the-loop workflows fullstack teams are actually shipping — not just demoing. Essential context if you're evaluating whether to commit budget to agent tooling this quarter. Read more
10 Cursor alternatives ranked by agentic power and real-world DX. A hands-on comparison of Claude Code, Windsurf, Zed, Kilo Code, Codeium, and five others — scored on context window handling, multi-file editing, pricing transparency, and production-readiness rather than marketing claims. If Cursor's pricing or vendor lock-in has you looking around, this is the most thorough public scorecard available. Read more
What to watch next
A Q1 2026 retrospective covering the Vercel pricing restructure, Next.js 16 launch, Claude 4.7, and the major outages that rewrote incident playbooks is currently queued as a draft on nextfuture — expect it to publish soon and provide the broadest industry-wide narrative of the quarter. Meanwhile, the Cursor-alternatives space is moving fast; a follow-up on agentic IDE benchmarks would be timely within the next two weeks.
This article was originally published on NextFuture. Follow us for more fullstack & AI engineering content.
