The environmental impact of the IT sector has shifted from a niche topic to a major concern for tech leaders. It is now becoming as strategic as digital sovereignty, especially in the context of global conflicts and the meteoric rise of Generative AI. Not forgetting that this high-level concern often coexists with a much more pragmatic daily reality for IT teams: ensuring that services don't crash over the weekend!
Historically, data centers were a minor part of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports. Their footprint was relatively small and easily obscured by the inherent complexity and geographical fragmentation of the cloud.
While a gradual increase in data center scale was expected, 2023 changed the trajectory. The GenAI boom has triggered an exponential demand for energy-intensive compute resources, creating a friction point with the energy efficiency goals that common sense dictates. In this new landscape, resource optimization is no longer just a "nice-to-have" cost-saving measure, it is a fundamental ethical and operational requirement.
To help navigate this, Google Cloud provides a framework and a dedicated tool to track and mitigate this impact.
Let’s explore GCP Carbon Footprint and how to use it as a compass in this complex environment.
The pillars of GCP Carbon Footprint
To move beyond the high-level discourse, we must look at the activable levers Google provides.
While this tool offers a starting point, their effectiveness depends entirely on how they are integrated into an organization’s operational DNA. Google gives you recommendations in this sense.
Opt for low carbon regions
The first lever is geographical. Google tracks the Carbon Free Energy percentage (CFE%) — the hourly availability of carbon-free energy — for every region.
Here's how to use this metric to choose the most appropriate regions for your usage:
- The "Low CO2" Indicator: Regions with a CFE% of 75% or higher are flagged with a green leaf icon in the console.
-
Enforcement via Policy: You can implement Organization Policy Constraints (
gcp.resourceLocations) to programmatically restrict deployments to the regions you chose, effectively making sustainability a hard requirement rather than a suggestion.
The Region Picker will help you select the most appropriate region following some criteria : carbon footprint, price and latency.
The Electricity Maps will give you more detailed information about the energy used in each region, to help you determine you choices.
Plan your use only according to your needs
The most sustainable resource is the one you don't use. Google integrates carbon data with its Active Assist suite to address the "Zombie VM" phenomenon:
- Unattended Project Detector: Using machine learning, GCP identifies projects that are likely abandoned but still drawing power and generating emissions.
- Right-sizing Recommendations: The tool identifies over-provisioned instances. Scaling down doesn't just reduce the bill; it directly lowers the infrastructure overhead allocated to your organization.
Google recommends defining scheduling logic to ensure that machines are only started during usage hours (e.g., by stopping instances at night) and it is even possible to optimize usage to fit the usage periods of intermittent energy sources, such as wind or solar power.
Best architectural practices to optimize use
The dashboard allows for a granular breakdown by service (Compute Engine vs. Cloud Storage vs. BigQuery). This visibility supports a shift toward Serverless architectures.
By moving from "Always-on" VMs to event-driven services (like Cloud Run or Cloud Functions), you offload the responsibility of hardware utilization to Google.
This also maximizes "Energy per request" efficiency, ensuring your carbon footprint is precisely what you need to consume to meet your business value.
The dashboard will allow you to track the progress of your efforts to modernize your information system architecture.
The need for a comprehensive approach
It is tempting to view a "green" dashboard as a mission accomplished. However, GCP Carbon Footprint is a compass, not the destination.
Here are some limitations to keep in mind for a more complete understanding of the subject:
- The tool currently focuses on CO2. A truly mature CSR strategy should also account for Water Usage Effectiveness (WUE) and the physical waste generated by hardware lifecycles.
- The metrics generated by the tool are excellent for Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting and establishing a baseline. But for those looking for deeper transparency these numbers should be cross-referenced with external benchmarks and lifecycle analysis tools.
Next steps
Google Cloud Carbon Footprint serves as a valuable tutor for engineering teams. It fosters the necessary dialogue about resource efficiency in an era where GenAI makes "infinite compute" a dangerous illusion. It is the beginning of a journey toward a more conscious architecture, not the end.
Among the actions to be taken, eco-design is a critical part of the process. Beyond just monitoring, it involves rethinking our software and systems from the ground up to be lean, efficient, and resilient.
For organizations wishing to increase transparency regarding physical infrastructure, work carried out by groups like The Shift Project or Boavizta offers valuable additional analysis to enrich this path toward more responsible digital practices.
![[ADK] Passing Session State to Remote Agents Over Stateless A2A](https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=1200,height=627,fit=cover,gravity=auto,format=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fum3jyjh3vh16vrlwp3on.png)
